This
is Friday and that means Friday’s Forgotten Books. After far too long an
absence, Patrick Ohl returns today with his review of They Love Not Poison by Sara Woods. Suggestions for more great
books to read can be found over at Patti’s blog. You
should check it out after you read Patrick’s review below….
I was bewitched—nay, downright seduced—by the blurb on the back of Sara
Woods’ They Love Not Poison. I was
promised a book that would serve as a sort of unofficial sequel to John Dickson
Carr’s The Burning Court: a
mysterious death via poison takes place and the culprit seems to be the
reincarnation of a 300-year old witch! With such an awesome idea, how can you
possibly go wrong?
Unfortunately, and it breaks my heart to
say this, Sara Woods finds a way to mess it up. The book’s story seems like it
couldn’t possibly fail: set in post-WWII England, it involves Woods’ series
character Antony Maitland. While staying at a friend’s place in a small farming
community, Maitland gets involved in serious matters when a neighbour’s wife
dies. Although she’s been ill for a while, the doctor finds the death
suspicious and refuses to sign a death certificate. The rumours say that a
young girl in the household is the reincarnation of a 300-year old witch, and
somehow is the person responsible for the murder. And into all this we get some
stuff about a lost treasure…
All jolly ingredients for a fun story,
aren’t they? But Sara Woods just can’t handle them. She makes terrible
decisions in plot construction. Some are apparently quite small— for instance,
it’s never explained why the doctor found the death suspicious in the first place.
But more important than the minor plot nitpicks: the pacing is absolutely terrible. Strands of plot are forgotten
for large chunks of the book, only to be summoned again at random when the
author remembers: “Oh yeah, there’s supposed to be a witch in here!”
Is there any atmosphere of the
supernatural? No, never, and if there were any attempts to do so they failed
miserably. There is no sense of dread or uncertainty. It’s a lifeless book with
faceless characters talking about how awful it is that someone should die but
let’s waste our time instead talking about some fictional local history.
But for me, the absolute cruncher came at
the ending, when right out of nowhere, a group of suspicious people shows up to
play our last-minute red herring. Despite the fact that they are absolutely
nasty people, Antony Maitland believes they didn’t kill the second victim of
this story. How comfortably decent of these thugs… but it instantly ruins any
effect of menace Woods tried to instill! Not only that, even though they are
innocent their existence turns out to be vital for the real culprit, and again,
these revelations all seem to be wild, unsubstantiated guesses. And to make
matters worse, the ending scene is one of those moronic ones where somebody is
tricked into giving the murderer away.
But what could I care by this point? I was bored…
and I hated to admit it to myself. I had such high hopes and they were
mercilessly dashed. The writing is sloppy, the characters are bland, there’s no
atmosphere to speak of, no cleverness in plot construction, the whole thing
ends on a cop-out, the pacing is terrible, and the book’s most interesting
ideas lie forgotten for most of the book! They
Love Not Poison is a terrible miscalculation, one of the biggest missed
opportunities I’ve come across in recent memory. I only hope that Woods’ other
books are better…
Anyone interested in the general plot idea
should find John Dickson Carr’s The
Burning Court and read (or re-read) it instead of this one.
Patrick
Ohl ©2013
The
nineteen-year-old Patrick Ohl continues to plot to take over the world when he
isn’t writing reviews of books he reads on his blog, At the Scene of the Crime.
In his spare time he conducts genetic experiments in his top-secret laboratory,
hoping to create a creature as terrifying as the Giant Rat of Sumatra in a bid
to take over the world. His hobbies include drinking tea and going outside to
do a barbecue in -10°C weather.
Sorry to hear this one bored you, Kevin. I've loved so many of her books.
ReplyDeleteThe review is from Patrick Ohl. I have not read the book and have no opinion on it.
ReplyDelete