Friday
means Friday’s Forgotten Books with Patti Abbott. Patti has declared today to
be in honor of Ross Macdonald. The list will be here later today. In the meantime,
check out Patrick Ohl’s review of The
Drowning Pool below…
When
Maude Slocum walks into Lew Archer’s office, it looks like another typical
case. She’s intercepted a nasty letter that was intended for her husband’s
eyes—one that would cast more than a shadow of doubt on her fidelity as a wife.
As it happens, her husband James will be a very rich man one day (when his
mother dies) and she isn’t particularly keen on going through divorce
proceedings. Plus, there’s a child to consider: Maude’s daughter Cathy. Maude
went through a divorce as a child and doesn’t want Cathy to experience the same
things.
And so
Lew Archer gets ready to investigate. He rides to the scene but Death hitches a
ride on the way, and very soon a body is discovered. The multimillionaire
matriarch of the Slocum family, who kept rule over her son and his family with
an iron fist, is found dead. She’s been drowned in the swimming pool. But was
it an accident? Did she simply slip? Or was it murder?
Well,
it’s a mystery novel and Mrs. Slocum was a multimillionaire, so you do the
math. What surprised me about this book is that although it is very much
written in the Chandler mould of hardboiled mysteries, it is still a
quintessential Ross Macdonald novel. We have a bickering family, the loss of a
parent/grand-parent, a child resenting her mother (while worshiping her
father)… all these things threaten to tear a family apart. (Sometimes, Lew
Archer seems like more of a family therapist than a detective.)
The
characters, as usual for Macdonald, are wonderful. They are all superbly
realised. The elderly Mrs. Slocum is not simply a cackling old witch (which is
always a danger with characters of her type). However, she really is far too
protective of her son James, a man who is weak-willed and spineless. He depends
on others and even though his relationship with Maude is a shambles, he has no
idea what he would do if she decided to leave. This, as well as his
relationship with an “artsy” sort of man at a local theatre, leads Maude in a
fit of frustration to accuse him of being a “fairy”. (The inference is clear.)
This
sharp characterization is not limited to the main players. Even such a minor
character as the local chief of police is wonderfully drawn out. Sometimes he
seems to be a classic thick-headed official who hates everyone else as a matter
of course (a.k.a. Raymond Chandler’s favourite kind of cop)… and eventually you
find out why he behaves the way he does at times. It’s an incredibly powerful
scene. There’s an Italian with a French accent (what kind of geneticist came up
with that?) who owns a bar, and even
though we only see him for a handful of scenes we feel a certain connection
with him.
In fact,
there’s only one thing seriously wrong with this book and that’s the plot. It’s
odd, seeing how it’s a Ross Macdonald novel. Usually, he stretches things to a
point of practically over-plotting.
But the first half of the book is very slow—it seems like a novel of character,
like a quiet domestic affair that should be solved by Archer’s staying with the
Slocum family and investigating things. This slow pace seems just right for the
tone of the novel… but in the third act, the book abruptly changes pace and
introduces international criminals, gang murder, and everything short of
bestiality. In fact, one of the book’s last scenes seems like something
directly from a James Bond movie! It’s very jarring, and doesn’t seem at all like
Lew Archer’s style.
Add to
that the fact that the mystery is simply disappointing. It makes sense— in
fact, the solution is perfectly plausible. You don’t doubt the explanation
Macdonald gives you— but you do begin
doubting whether Lew Archer is human. Because short of omnipotence I have no
idea how he tumbled to the solution of the mystery. How did he know Didit did
it? Magic, I suppose. You never find out and I couldn’t even make a proper
guess.
And
although generally speaking detectives who pull conclusions out of a hat annoy
me, I can’t say that Lew Archer left me feeling that way. The Drowning Pool is a very well-written book that captures the
drama of a murder and the effect it has on a family struggling to keep
together. When it focuses on this family, the book is positively poetic. But
when it decides to throw in some distracting action-oriented stuff, it stumbles
hard. The book reads like Ross Macdonald struggling to throw off Raymond
Chandler’s influence on the hardboiled mystery. Much of the time he seems to be
succeeding but occasionally, Chandler penetrates through everything and spoils
it. It’s a mixed bag—most of it is very Ross Macdonald-like material but by the
third act, it feels like the plot has stepped into the alternate dimension of a
James Bond book, and the Chandler-like style doesn’t work in all parts of the
book. The book has masterpiece potential, but in the end, it is forced to
settle for “pretty good” status.
Patrick
Ohl ©2013
Patrick Ohl
is a 20-year old Canadian crime fiction aficionado who enjoys hobbies such as
taxidermy and runs a dilapidated motel in the middle of nowhere alongside his
crazed mother. He enjoys relaxing in his subterranean evil lair while watching
his favourite hockey team, the Toronto Maple Leafs, and will occasionally make
chicken chow mein to die for. His life is accompanied by a soundtrack composed
by John Williams, and James Earl Jones provides occasional voice-overs.
Terrific review Patrick - I don't mind the actions tuff at the end though (worked well in the movie)
ReplyDeleteMy thanks to Patrick Ohl for yet another excellent and well done review.
ReplyDeleteI haven't read this one, so I can't weigh in on the ending. I don't necessarily read someone like Macdonald for the solutions, though.
ReplyDelete