It
has been quite awhile since Earl was here with one of his “History’s Rich With
Mysteries”guest posts. Earl is back today with an update on H. H. Holmes who he
first wrote about last October.
History's
Rich With Mysteries
When I look at the past, I find stories
about people which fascinate me, particularly those in which there is a curious
mixture of fact, legend, and mysterious uncertainty. In this series of
articles, I want to explore some of those stories. I think of them as mysteries
swaddled in legend. While truth is always desired in most things, truth easily
becomes staid and boring. Legend, on the other hand, forever holds a hint of
romanticism and an aura of excitement borne of adventure, imagination and, of
course, mystery.
H. H.
Holmes: UPDATE – Was he Jack the Ripper?
Jeff Mudgett believes his great-great grandfather, one of America's
first and most prolific serial killers, was also London's Jack the Ripper. He
studied his ancestor for more than twenty years and presented his evidence in
his book, BLOODSTAINS.
I wrote about H. H. Holmes and his “Murder Castle” in this space a
year ago. He may have killed as many as two hundred people, most of them during
the Chicago World's Fair of 1893. That's more than the
total killed by Jeffrey Dahmer, John Wayne Gacy, Gary Ridgway, and Ted Bundy
combined.
 |
| The Murder Castle |
Convicted in 1894 of murder and fraud, the man born Herman W. Mudgett
in Gilmanton, New Hampshire in 1861, who later changed his name to H. H.
Holmes, was hanged in Philadelphia on May 7, 1896, nine days before his
thirty-fifth birthday.
His great-great grandson, Jeff Mudgett, a retired attorney and former
U.S. Naval Reserve Commander, also formed a theory that Holmes substituted
someone else for the execution and made his escape. That theory was disproven
when the body was exhumed, and a DNA test confirmed the identity of the corpse
as H. H. Holmes.
Holmes was a scandalous figure in Chicago even before his murderous
exploits were revealed. He was a talented con man who sold fake medicines,
engaged in shady business deals, and was married to three women at the same
time. He bought life insurance on people, presented stolen cadavers as their
remains, and collected on the policies. Hardly a day went by that he was not
threatened or sued by people he cheated or owed money to.
 |
| H. H. Holmes |
That is, until a period in late 1888. For several months, Holmes' name
was not bandied about in the newspapers or the courts of Chicago. Mr. Mudgett
discovered evidence which shows a passenger named H. Holmes sailed to England
during that time and was there when Jack the Ripper claimed his victims.
Mudgett was assisted in his research by CIA criminologist Amaryllis Fox. The
two of them traveled to London to study the five murders in the Whitechapel
section of the city attributed to the Ripper.
Here is some of the evidence they developed and presented:
. . .eyewitness claimed Jack was short of stature. Holmes was
approximately five feet seven.
. . .witnesses also said Jack spoke with an American accent.
. . .based on how his victims were carved up, London investigators
were convinced Jack had anatomical or surgical knowledge. Holmes graduated from
medical school and was a surgeon.
. . .a handwriting analysis indicated the writing of Jack and Holmes
was a 97.95% match.
Critics of Mudgett's conclusions say Holmes and the Ripper could not
have been the same person because their methods of killing were different. They
point to the fact that the Ripper slit the throats of his victims, then removed
various internal organs. Holmes, they say, did not do that. I could argue that
perhaps he did.
In fact, Holmes killed in a number of different ways. Some of his
victims were suffocated while some were given a deadly overdose of chloroform.
Others were hanged, gassed, poisoned, or starved to death. The manner of death
of many of his victims remains unknown since he incinerated many of them, left
some to disintegrate in acid or lime pits, and stripped some down to skeletons
which he sold to medical schools. For these reasons, it is not known how many
he killed by which method.
It's quite possible he slit the throats of some of his victims and
disemboweled them as Jack did during his Whitechapel reign of terror. It's also
possible that Whitechapel in 1888 was a “training period” for Holmes during
which he experimented with killing in the manner associated with Jack the
Ripper, but moved on to other methods when he was back in the US by the
beginning of 1889.
While in prison awaiting his execution, Holmes wrote
a memoir which included his confession to twenty-seven murders, even though
most counts put that number close to ten times that amount. He said nothing
about the time he spent in London. Was that because he was not Jack the Ripper
and did not commit the Whitechapel murders? Before trying to answer that
question, consider the overall credibility of his confession. Some of the twenty-seven people he said he
killed were later found to be very much alive. With that in mind, it seems
futile to place any credence in what he admitted to or did not admit to. One
has to wonder, after the life he'd led, if he was in his right mind by then or
if reality has escaped him.
Over the years, a large number of suspects have been offered as the
real identity of Jack the Ripper, some supported by convincing evidence. None
of them, however, has been compelling enough to exclude all the others. Jeff
Mudgett's belief that his great-great grandfather was the Ripper can be
considered a suspect as strong as the others.
The bottom line is that we still don't know beyond a shadow of doubt
who Jack the Ripper really was.
And, most likely, we never will.
Earl Staggs ©2017
Earl Staggs earned all Five Star
reviews for his novels MEMORY OF A MURDER and JUSTIFIED
ACTION and has twice received a Derringer Award for Best Short Story of
the Year. He served as Managing Editor
of Futures Mystery Magazine, as President of the Short Mystery Fiction Society,
and is a frequent speaker at conferences and
seminars.
Posts
