It has been
almost four years since the last time C. Hope Clark was here with a guest post.
Please welcome her back today as she explains that you do have some options
regarding outlines. I have always resisted outlining thinking of it as that
mandated hideous way of writing crammed down my throat in middle school and
regurgitated several times a year through High School and College. Made me
think about things a bit differently. Might strike a cord with you as well.
Options to
Outlining a Mystery (or any genre, for that matter)
By C. Hope Clark
Outlining dredges up a dry academic déjà
vu for most. The formality of taking something creative and distilling it into
a dry outline would make me hate the project in school. All those roman
numerals, letters and numbers dissecting an idea apart.
However, after publishing eight
novels and two nonfiction books, I’ve reached a happy medium with the process,
and can even give outlining a much stronger sense of credibility. Part of that
acceptance came from the knowledge that forecasting your novel doesn’t
necessarily mean all those numbers and letters.
Most writers have heard the argument of
pantser versus outlining, but I argue that there are gradients that fall in between.
It’s not an either-or choice. A full-blown, freestyle pantser is the opposite
of a detailed outliner, each on the opposite ends of a spectrum. We can find
all sorts of in-betweens to satisfy the type of novel prepper you are.
Journalistically
Before writing the novel, define what
any journalist would for a story: who, what, when, where, why, and how. Make it
one liners, paragraphs, or whole pages for each one. . . completely your option.
Who are the players? What is their problem? What are their strengths? When did
this story take place, and of course, where? Why is there a problem, and why
does it matter that it’s solved? And then, how do they do it?
The answers are the skeleton to your
story and can be considered a rough outline. If you despise detailed outlines,
you could take these answers and start writing.
Some writers, like me, function best
linearly, starting from Chapter 1 and writing straight through to Chapter The
End. You can outline the whole book from start to finish or write pantser-like
the same way. However, for those of us who would rather be beaten than outline,
but also don’t want to write ten chapters into a book and lose our way, there
is a middle ground.
That option is to outline three
chapters, then stop and write them. Then stop and look around. Learn anything
new in the experience? Did a character speak to you and suggest an angle you
hadn’t pondered?
Then outline three more chapters,
sit back, and weigh where you are again. How do your characters like the direction?
Three roughly outlined chapters might become two or five chapters, and in the
writing you have a revelation about a unique direction without being too far
committed.
The
Juicy Parts First
You know those parts. The climax. .
. the second climax. The sex scene and the murder. The deceptions and the
stings. When we find out who did it or learn who didn’t. Some authors write the
ending first, then work backwards, needing to visualize what everybody becomes
in order to understand how to write where they began.
You might be the type of writer who
wants all the big juicy parts written first, laid out, so you can decide how
they connect. Write the scenes on index cards and move them around, sorting, to
make the story work best, or use a software program like Scrivener with its
virtual index cards.
You’ll find as many ways to write a book
as there are books to write. And outlines don’t have to be I, II, III and A, B,
C. Try each method to see which one makes your adrenaline kick in or your
creativity flow. The remarkable part of writing is that there is no right way
other than the one that works for you.
C.
Hope Clark ©2018
C.
Hope Clark’s latest result of her linear outlining is Newberry Sin, her eighth mystery, released April 2018. The fourth
in the Carolina Slade Mysteries, Newberry
Sin is set in a beautiful South Carolina town, and digs into the secrets of
its elder stallwark agrarian residents who appear to have been curiously
compromised by a femme fatale to sell off land for fire-sale prices. At the
urgings of a fearful lot of wives and a journalist turned DJ, investigator
Carolina Slade delves into the mystery only for her curiosity to jeopardize her
job, her friendships, her marriage proposal, and ultimately her life. C. Hope
Clark’s books are well-loved, and she is a frequent presenter for Writer’s
Digest, conferences, libraries, and book clubs. www.chopeclark.com
10 comments:
Glad to be back, Kevin! Thanks for having me.
Would love to hear from other writers how they "outline" their books.
Thank you, Hope, for coming back. I hope we get some comments as I would like to hear from other folks too.
Thank you for the wonderful options to the torture of outlining. When writing my novel, I wrote my most "pressing" scenes first, the ones in the forefront of my mind, then started at the beginning, and sometimes filled in elsewhere, then back to the beginning... (in other words, I was a pantser.) Then I went to a writer's conference, and read a few books about writing a novel, and they said "YOU MUST OUTLINE OR DO A STORY BOARD." (or some other form of organized writing.) Well, I was crushed, thinking I didn't have what it takes or that I wasn't really a writer. Then I found out Dean Koontz (my fav) is a pantser. And I started reading articles like Hope's, saying an outline doesn't have to be chiseled in stone, and that it's just "thinking ahead" on paper, and that I can change it anytime I want. Love it! This article reinforces my belief that there is no wrong way to write - except to not write.
I think I avoided writing for a long time because I am a pantser through and through. My life has been lived like that and my writing had to start that way. I have learned over time, through following Hope, that the only right way to write is to write. You can pick up the pieces you have written and make a whole of them and that's all right. Thank you for having Hope and thank you, Hope, for introducing me to another blogger in your blog hopping.
There is no right way. There really isn't. I consider it rather arrogant for a writer to think their way is the best. That's like saying you should only read one genre. It's a choice and a trial and error. If I outlined I would write faster, no doubt. But that so takes the fun out of the storytelling for me.
Well, it may seem like I should do things the other way around, but I outline my nonfiction books but not fiction. I don't have a good reason for not outlining fiction, it just seems like the story goes where it needs to go. For non-fiction I wouldn't even think of trying to write it without an outline becaause I want to include all relevant material.
Jack, I do the exact same thing except for my three-chapter method for my fiction. I like the fiction to take off on its own, but I want my NF to be very structured. We think alike!
When I get an idea I dash out the first page or two - then outline, mine are more lists than anything and start writing. Like you I reach a place where I again outline/list and then write again. Great post. An Oh, by the way. As a former Jr. High English teacher, I taught kids traditional outlining, then in the 80s, it all went away. I still, think outlining is an excellent skill, diagraming sentences, not so much.
Neil - I get what diagramming was supposed to do, but it seemed an awkward way to do it. I still hate thinking what the names of all the sentence parts were. I just know them, what they do, and how to use them.
Post a Comment